This is interesting from the perspective of the LXX vs MT genealogies debate and whether the 2nd Cainan of Luke 3 should be included. The arguments in favor of the LXX strike me as formidable (even Rodger Young appears to lean that direction now). If the 2nd Cainan is included, that would make Jochabed part of the 26th generation (Amram-Jochabed), rather than the 25th, and would arguably fit the numerology better.
In that case, the LXX has a woman of the 26th generation (Amram-Jochabed), whose name means 'YHWH (26) my glory' giving birth to a son to whom both the name 'YHWH' and His 'glory' is revealed (possible also during her - 26th generation - lifetime?). Keeping her as the 26th generation (rather than 25th as per MT) also matches her association with the number 26 in the other respects mentioned in this article.
This is interesting from the perspective of the LXX vs MT genealogies debate and whether the 2nd Cainan of Luke 3 should be included. The arguments in favor of the LXX strike me as formidable (even Rodger Young appears to lean that direction now). If the 2nd Cainan is included, that would make Jochabed part of the 26th generation (Amram-Jochabed), rather than the 25th, and would arguably fit the numerology better.
In that case, the LXX has a woman of the 26th generation (Amram-Jochabed), whose name means 'YHWH (26) my glory' giving birth to a son to whom both the name 'YHWH' and His 'glory' is revealed (possible also during her - 26th generation - lifetime?). Keeping her as the 26th generation (rather than 25th as per MT) also matches her association with the number 26 in the other respects mentioned in this article.
Granted it could be sliced the other way too.